42-50-800kV equivalent
Going to buy a Electrostik. Have most of the stuff but need a motor.. What is an equivalent to a 42-50-800kV motor. I could not find an answer on HK or Hpartz website. Thanks
PS. Have some Turnigy HXT900 servos. Will they fit the bill? |
Equiv to the rimfire, you mean?
http://www3.towerhobbies.com/cgi-bin...1&I=LXLWV3&P=3 REQUIRES: Brushless Motor-compatible 45 amp Electronic Speed Control Propeller: 12x6 - 13x8 electric SPECS: Motor Diameter: 1.7" (42mm) Motor Length: 2.0" (50mm) Shaft Diameter: .20" (5mm) Shaft Length: .67" (17mm) Lead Length: 3" (76mm) Connectors: Bullet type, 4.0mm diameter Max. Constant Current: 50A Max. Surge Current: 80A Max. Constant Watts: 925W Max. Burst Watts: 1480W No Load Current: 2.6A Input Voltage: 11.1-14.8V (3-4S LiPo) RPM/V (kV Rating): 800 Weight: 7oz (198g) ? |
What a weird spec. To get 925W at 50A means they think they can get over 18V from a 4S battery.
And how about Constant current 50A max, Surge current 80A max but it only needs a 45A ESC ? Either they're trying to sell a lot of ESCs or they're just having a laugh ;). Steve |
I think it means you can prop it up to those specs or pull amps till it fails on you.... Hmmm
|
Quote:
Motocalc suggests running this motor at the peak currents of 80 Amps will burn it up. Even running the motor at the 50 Amps continuous rating will result in motor efficiency of only around 50%, and winding temperatures of over 400 F. It's going to get hot if you run much more than 40 Amps through it. This rimfire motors windings measure out at 0.036 Ohms. So at 80 Amps, you're loosing 230 watts in the windings alone. (P = I Squared times R) This motors specifications indicate maximum burst watts is 1480. That is 211 watts per ounce of motor weight. IMHO, anything much over 100 watts of power per ounce of motor weight might be pushing it a little. And doing so usually results in the motor efficiency dropping like a rock. FYI, one of my models recommended a 400 Watt or so Rimfire motor, with the warning not to touch the motor after a flight, because of the risk of burns. :confused: As a comparison, a $$$$ Hacker A40-10S motor will run at 89% efficiency while pulling 52 Amps on a good quality 4S Lipo. This motor weighs in at 9.4 ounces, with a winding resistance of 0.007 ohms, about 1/5th the winding resistance of the Rimfire. That, just turns into heat, not turning the propeller. http://www.aero-model.com/Hacker-Brushless-A40-10S.aspx I now have 8 of those $$$$ Hacker motors, ranging from an A30, two A40's, three A50's an A60-16M, and a new A60-5S. Every one of them performs to their specifications, and to their current and watt ratings without issue. (Just got the A60-5S, have not run it yet.) Any good quality motor that gives winding resistance measurements of perhaps 0.01 ohms or less, with similar 8 or 9 ounces of motor weight should perform well. There are a lot of those good motors out there. Problem is, more than a few of the "cheap" motors don't provide the all important winding resistance information. |
Well that is obvious you do not wanna use this application in a heavy plane... Well do not use 4s, as most folks see the size of this motor and think 4 cells.... 3s is a better answer ... The hacker you mentioned... What is the can length and kv rating?
|
Quote:
This motor is only about $15 more than the Rimfire motor. |
not bad for 4s and 750kv... I love learning about motor windings... --- kyleservicetech --- could you answer this bugging question in my mind???? I always wonder the pluses and minus of wire gauge in a winding, the way it is delta or the other, and if the magnet strength have any effect? --- Scott
|
Quote:
Some of the real cheap motors don't fill the steel slots, because that takes time, and time is money. Those motors can have lower efficiencies because of that. As for delta or wye, either works well, and three phase power transformers can be wound either way. Most commercial three phase motors are wound in delta. And most of the model bushless motors I've run across are wound in wye. Which is better? It really does not matter, because going from delta to wye in a given KV rating simply requires the use of different gauge, and different number of turns in each magnetic slot. As for magnets, the reason our brushless motors have the power they do is because of the very powerful magnets used. The higher the magnetic strength of the magnet, the less turns of magnet wire you need for a given KV rating. Less turns means you can use heavier gauge wire, making it possible to run even more current through it. Using those ferrite magnets in our high powered motors would not work out well. The magnetic field of a motor pulling 50 Amps plus would demagnetize those ferrite magnets. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Thanks Scott Back in the mid 1980's before high powered motors were available, I was taking burned up brush type motors from work, rewinding them for more power, and putting them into models. These were 24 volt permanent ferrite magnet type motors. The iron slots in the armature were only 1/2 filled originally by the mfgr, I managed to double the motor efficiency by actual dyno tests by filling the iron slots with heavier wire. Problem was, the motors commutator for the brushes could not handle the extra current, and motor life was only a few flights before a meltdown. These motors were running about 15 Amps at about 20 volts. Astroflight came out with their cobalt high powered brush type motors, and those motors from work were not even close. Now we've got brushless motors, where even the lowest cost cheap China motors far outperform the very expensive Astroflight brush type motors typical of the 1980 to 1990's. Of course the Astro motors used top quality steel, bearings and so on. but my last Astro 40 brushless type motor used a brass gear on the motor shaft, and an aluminum gear on the prop shaft. That setup didn't last more than 40-50 flights before the gears were worn out. And I totally enclosed the gears with a top quality gear lube. How times have changed in the past ten years. |
Quote:
If the specs generally line up, it should be a good replacement. Always assume you don't want the max worst-case burst amperage through the ESC to be more than 85% of the ESCs rating is the policy I apply. So, make sure the max amps of the motor is less than (0.85 x ESC rating). Dave |
Quote:
|
That goes out of the very limited area where I know much, if anything...
Dave |
Quote:
Nowdays, even name brand standard servos are pretty reasonable in price. http://www3.towerhobbies.com/cgi-bin...&I=LXXCZ9&P=ML |
Thanks all for your help. Bottom line.
Turnigy 32 outrunner 45a ESC Hitech 485 servos 3200mah 11.1 20C Lipo Spektrum sport 500 receiver Have I missed anything? Thanks again.... |
I would say you want to bump up the ESC size a bit.
They recc a 60A for that motor. Dave |
Quote:
That Turnigy motor is rated three to four LiPos, so with 4 LiPo's, an 12/6 prop would be in the ball park. Motocalc suggests the Turnigy motor will turn this prop around 9700 RPM, 47 Amps, 13.8 Volts 650 watts, 86% efficiency, and putting out about 90 ounces of thrust on the ground. Raqte of climb is esitmated at about 1700 feet per minute, based on a total weight of 73 ounces. All in all, for that motor, and that model, pretty good. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
One thing about these electrics, once the motor is armed, moving the throttle results in instant power. And that Turnigy motor has close to one horsepower on the prop. The DX7 transmitter is one where you can mix the throttle with one of the other transmitter toggle switches, so the motor is dead unless that switch is in the proper position. I found a way to do this with the DX7 on the Internet. Bad things can happen, if you're playing with the servo directions on your transmitter, and accidentally reverse the throttle. Instant full power. As an added safety measure, whenever doing any fiddling around with your electric model, TAKE THE :censor: PROP OFF! |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Electric Flight Safety Ideally every electric aircraft you have should be equipped with an arming device on the craft itself (either and ESC switch or power interrupter plug) as well as having a throttle cut switch on your transmitter. Since electric motors can startup unexpectedly and inflict a lot of painful damage the double precaution can avoid some nasty injuries. Although an arming switch/plug on the aircraft ought to be sufficient on its own there are times when it is armed with the intention of flying but something distracts you and the aircraft is now vulnerable to a careless jog of the throttle lever, the transmitter becomes your last line of defense. I have implemented a transmitter disable switch for all my aircraft (helis as well as conventional planes) this way the process is second nature to me. The idea is that whenever the aircraft is not expected to fly the transmitter switch is in the disable position. The moment before takeoff I switch it to enable, fly as required then the moment the aircraft touches down and I have completed taxiing it I always click the switch to disabled. Some of the more advanced transmitters have the ability to set a throttle cut switch up within their menus however others need a little work to make it happen. Below I give the process needed to set up a Spektrum DX7, it is likely this technique can be used on other transmitters, it is well worth doing and if you are still unsure how try looking online for your particular transmitter. In my case I use the switch at the top right hand corner of the transmitter as the kill switch, this seems to be a standard as far as I can tell, the DX7 does have a label saying HOLD for this switch (as well as Ruder D/R). Setup Process For the Spektrum DX7 Transmitter: From your selected plane setup menu (pressing scroll and select simultaneously) move to one of the mixing channels (I used Mix 3, for mixing with the gear switch - kyleservicetech). Select source and destination for the mix to be THRO (short for throttle), the display should show: THRO -> THRO Now move to the rate section and set both sections to -100% (you will be able to set one of them with the throttle stick down and the other with it up). Move to the SW: section and set it to MIX Move to the OFFSET section and set it to -100%. If you toggle the gear switch you should see the text to the right of the THRO -> THRO change from OFF to ON, when this reads ON the throttle is disabled (this should be with the switch pulled toward you). [PROG.MIX1] THRO->THRO ON RATE: -100% -100% >SW:MIX OFFSET:-100 Carefully try this out with your model turned on, with the switch toward you it should not be possible to start the motor at all (even helis should be disabled despite the position of the idle up switch). And, as always, check all remaining transmitter functions for both direction and unexpected operations. In case something else got changed by accident. All that remains now is to cultivate the habit of ensuring the switch is in the disabled position whenever you pick up the aircraft and whenever it is not on the flying field. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:35 AM. |
Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2005 WattfFlyer.com
RCU Eflight HQ