WattFlyer RC Electric Flight Forums - Discuss radio control eflight

WattFlyer RC Electric Flight Forums - Discuss radio control eflight (http://www.Wattflyer.com/forums/index.php)
-   General Electric Discussions (http://www.Wattflyer.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=3)
-   -   Some unusual skis (http://www.Wattflyer.com/forums/showthread.php?t=72821)

dgjessing 12-18-2013 12:22 AM

Some unusual skis
 
I recently put some floats on one of my foamies, and then tried them out on snow as well. I'm so impressed with how well those floats works as skis that I'm now making a new set that will look pretty much like floats, but will only be for snow :D. Here are the foam cores with wood longerons glued in place:

http://www.wsukes.com/temp/DSCF3068.JPG

Based on my experience with more conventional skis last winter, one of the biggest issues is sinking in too deep if the snow is fluffy, or kinda wet. These ought to be immune to that as they are much wider and much longer. More like a couple of toboggans. Should glide right over foot prints too.

Another issue I noticed last winter was that the sides of flat, thin skis could dig into the snow upon landing if you come in with any significant yaw. These new ones will have nice tall sides which should just slide along instead of digging in.

Finally, these aren't going to pivot at the wheel axle point - they will be fixed front and back. Seems to work just fine with the re-purposed float plane.

More as things progress :)

fhhuber 12-18-2013 02:17 AM

Some things scale strangely and skis are one of those things. You need increasing area per oz loading as the skis get smaller.

Amphib and floatplane models have always done well on snow.

Sizing skis to "look right" compared to full scale generally leaves you with skis that are too small.

solentlife 12-18-2013 06:38 AM

Hi DGJ .... just wondering are you going to angle up front ? I'm a little confused as they appear to be tapered sections ?

Nigel

dgjessing 12-18-2013 06:53 PM

Like this:

http://www.wsukes.com/temp/DSCF3069.JPG

I'm going to glass the bottom surfaces for durability, then paint.

solentlife 12-18-2013 07:00 PM

Magic !

Cheers
Nigel

dgjessing 12-20-2013 12:10 AM

Well. I could have them ready to go tomorrow but the weather is not cooperating. Next few day's forecast calls for 50-60 f temps, lots of rain, lots of wind :roll:. All the snow is going to disappear...

FlyWheel 12-22-2013 02:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by fhhuber (Post 934744)
Some things scale strangely and skis are one of those things. You need increasing area per oz loading as the skis get smaller.

Amphib and floatplane models have always done well on snow.

Sizing skis to "look right" compared to full scale generally leaves you with skis that are too small.

That's because you're not scaling down the snow to match the plane. The same applies to the air density, which is why a lot of 'scale' modelers have to cheat a little. ;-)

dgjessing 12-23-2013 10:48 PM

OK, bring on the snow!

http://www.wsukes.com/temp/DSCF3078.JPG

The rear attachment is a wooden plate with velcro on it. I can switch from wheels to skis in a minute or so :).

Doesn't look like the weather is going to cooperate till next year though...

Larry3215 12-24-2013 12:50 AM

Looks good!

dgjessing 12-30-2013 11:24 PM

And a more conventional set of skis (appearance-wise), still more like toboggans:

http://www.wsukes.com/temp/DSCF3089.JPG

Snow later this week; can't wait :)

xmech2k 12-31-2013 12:24 AM

Cool! Hopefully it'll rotate for takeoff. Does the cat approve?

kyleservicetech 12-31-2013 12:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dgjessing (Post 935096)
OK, bring on the snow!

http://www.wsukes.com/temp/DSCF3078.JPG

The rear attachment is a wooden plate with velcro on it. I can switch from wheels to skis in a minute or so :).

Doesn't look like the weather is going to cooperate till next year though...

That does look interesting!

Right now, we've got a half foot plus of snow on the ground around here. Methinks my old 150% scratch built Electrostreak would work well on skis. Personally I'd just buy a set of ski's but have not found any place that makes them.

What is the wingspan, area, and weight of the model?

Let us know how it works on the snow!

solentlife 12-31-2013 11:10 AM

Just wondering about the cross braces between the 'skis' .. will they snag in snow ?

I have a bunch of alloy V main u/c similar to the float frames here :>

http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y24...Cessna1821.jpg

The floats I bought for my Skyartec Cessna but never fitted. I ought to scratch up a model for them.

Nigel

fhhuber 12-31-2013 05:59 PM

If the cross braces at the top of typical floats were low enough to be snagging, then the nose of the floats would be digging in.

solentlife 12-31-2013 06:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by fhhuber (Post 935748)
If the cross braces at the top of typical floats were low enough to be snagging, then the nose of the floats would be digging in.

It was just crossing my mind that when I bought my floats and then looked at them rigged ... the cross brace seems low. On water I would expect it to be OK, but on snow - it crossed my mind that snow / ice could build up on them ...

It all depends of course how far the model sinks into the snow ...

Nigel

fhhuber 12-31-2013 06:56 PM

Just have the cross-braces above the tips of the skis and they won't dig in before the tips.

Generally if the tips can lift above the bumps in the snow you could have the cross-braces almost on the snow.

This is why skis don't scale well... if the tips dig in you're done and as the skis get smaller they tend to dig in more easily.

dgjessing 01-03-2014 09:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by xmech2k (Post 935665)
Cool! Hopefully it'll rotate for takeoff. Does the cat approve?

Rotating for takeoff turns out to be an issue. The cat didn't catch this...

I took both planes out for a quick test today in the 15 degree weather :eek:. They both work, but the takeoff run is long, then quickly straight up 'cause you've pulled way back on the stick to make something happen.

I'm going to experiment with tilting the nose(s) up a bit more.

fhhuber 01-03-2014 10:35 PM

Make the rear of the skis able to rise and allow the nose to go up.

On snow you do not need the ski to keep the tail up like you need with floats on water.

Larry3215 01-04-2014 12:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by fhhuber (Post 936148)
Make the rear of the skis able to rise and allow the nose to go up.

On snow you do not need the ski to keep the tail up like you need with floats on water.

+1

dadman 01-06-2014 12:37 AM

cool skis
 
I am wanting to set up a pair of unused foam pontoons on a j 3 arf i just finished. Does anyone know how I determine a c.g.? I am cautioned by experienced flyers this will be critical to handling the rig, but they dont know how to determine a new balance point.

gramps2161 01-06-2014 01:02 AM

Here is a great place of info on setting up floats, and to buy floats if you need them.
http://www.wattflyer.com/forums/showthread.php?t=72821

fhhuber 01-06-2014 04:24 AM

RE setting up floats. Keep the SAME CG for the aircraft.

Then the floats should be placed so the model floats with the pontoons level or SLIGHTLY nose-up.
The nose of the floats should extend well forward from the prop on a typical plane such as a Piper Cub or Cessna 152/172 style

The mounting angle of the pontoons should hold the nose of the plane up 2 to 5 deg vs normal level flight cruise attitude (without floats) The goal here is to have the floats very close to level in normal cruise at the higher weight, so the floats will give minimum drag in flight.

Paint/cover the bottom of the floats in WHITE. This will give best reflection from the water so you can judge height from the water better when landing. Misjudging height and resulting late "flair" will flip the airplane as the nose of the floats dig into the water surface.

dadman 01-06-2014 04:34 AM

Short sweet and helpful. lovin this hobby. Thanks

road king 97 01-06-2014 03:57 PM

I have a building jig for skis but they were for bigger nitro planes and the skies are to heavy for electrict . I could build a smallers jig and laminate some very thin veneere and they would be light but strong. I used rubber bands to hold up the nose on each ski and it worked out fine but i dont fly that much in the winter anymore . joe

dgjessing 03-03-2014 12:32 AM

Update Re: the skis shown in post #8, back a way, and the issue with "rotating" for takeoff.

I did indeed modify the mounting angle so the plane was sitting back a bit more (nose higher at rest). This worked, more or less, but the angle of the skies had a pronounced effect on the plane's flight characteristics, and without a significant flare upon landing, landings were dicey because the points of the skis touched down first, which often resulted in an inelegant, violent nose-over.

So this evening I've made a change:

http://www.wsukes.com/temp/DSCF3161.JPG

The rear support is .019" (thin) music wire which distorts as shown and allows the tail to settle down. Once the pressure isn't on the skis they fall down and stop level with the fuselage center line. Hopefully this will fix both of the above problems

I think I'll get my last chance of the season to try them out tomorrow or Tuesday. :)


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:49 AM.

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2005 WattfFlyer.com
RCU Eflight HQ

Page generated in 0.10279 seconds with 13 queries