View Single Post
Old 05-01-2012, 09:44 PM   #16
solentlife
Super Contributor
 
solentlife's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Ex UK Brit now in Latvia west coast - Ventspils
Posts: 2,957
View solentlife's Gallery47
Thanked 150 Times in 148 Posts
Club: Ex Waltham Chase and Meon Valley Soaring. May start "RC Latvija Club"
Awards Showcase

Scratchbuilders Award  Outstanding Contributor Award  125mph Speed Demon 
iTrader: (0)
Friends: (3)
Default

Originally Posted by Old Fart View Post
You never want to point the antenna at the plane. ALL antennas (of this type anyway) have a null straight "up". 72 mHz, 35 mHZ also have that problem. In the old days before we had "no code hams", we all learned that for VHF/UHF operations


People have a natural tendency to point the antenna at the plane. "Bending" it 90 degrees makes it pretty un-natural to do that.

I haven't seen any RF studies that show 90 is better than anything else (but I bend mine at 90 when it comes out of the case anyway)
How it was put to me was to consider the usual attitude of the Rx antena and my Tx antena should parellel it. Of course we know that the model will fly all sorts of attitudes but we normal sport flyers usually spend more time on the level than most ... OK if a 3D - then antena is vertical ?

Funny in the days 35mHz .... very few radios allowed you to alter antena out of Tx ... there were a few where pilots tended to fly on trays etc. and the Tx was flat ... then they angled their antenas vertical !! Well the guys I saw did !!

222kph PKJ,Mig3,64+50mm T45,HK PKJ twin,ME109,HK Edge540,Cessna182,Skymaster Biplane,F15,70mm F16 EDF,Ultimate Biplane,SE5, Qbee10,450 Heli, Founder 9x forum: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Flysky_RC_radio/
- Subscribe to my Youtube: "solentlifeuk"
solentlife is offline  
  Reply With Quote
 
Page generated in 0.11799 seconds with 17 queries