| Wattflyer RC Network: RC Universe :: RCU Magazine :: RCU Forums :: RCU Classifieds :: RCU User Reviews :: RCU YouTube |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|||||||
| Register | Members List | Wattflyer Extras | Articles | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Social Groups | Photo Gallery |
| Beginners New to e-power flying? Get the low down in here from experienced e-power RC pilots! |
| Thank you for your support (hide ads) | |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 | ||
|
New Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 10
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
iTrader: (0)
Friends: (0)
|
I have a Sig Kadet EP42 and love the plane, but I was wondering if it would be possible to add a steerable tailwheel. The plane performs great after takeoff, but it wants to veer to one side or another quickly after you apply power initially. The wheels are small enough to prevent takeoff on grass in most cases, so I end up trying to takeoff on narrow strips of asphalt/concrete. I have tried applying power slowly/quickly, applying rudder, etc. and nothing seemed to make a difference. I am a new pilot, so I'm sure my inexperience is a big factor here. Any advice would be greatly appreciated! Tks, Mike Barker breadman@bvu.net |
||
|
|
|
|
#2 | ||
|
Super Contributor
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Posts: 1,056
Thanked 98 Times in 96 Posts
iTrader: (1)
Friends: (3)
|
A tail wheel would definitely help and larger main wheels would allow use off grass.
|
||
|
|
|
|
#3 | ||
|
Ya got any Beeman's?
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 1,408
Thanked 147 Times in 145 Posts
Club: CVMRCC, SEFSD
iTrader: (0)
Friends: (5)
|
Since you say you guys are both novice flyers, I have to ask if you're aware of the effect of propeller torque on a plane, especially on a taildragger at takeoff. My guess is, unless you have a good wind from the right, it wants to veer left all the time? On a taildragger, you have to be ready with that rudder, usually, you'll need to apply right rudder to counteract the prop torque. A tailwheel will help, heck you need it for taxiing, but as soon as the tail lifts, it's all about rudder. I'm surprised they didn't include a tailwheel on that model.
Hope that's of some help. |
||
|
|
|
|
#4 | ||
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Neenah Wisconsin
Posts: 231
Thanked 42 Times in 40 Posts
iTrader: (0)
Friends: (0)
|
Originally Posted by mbarker
Sometimes it helps to arrange the wheels with "toe out".
See attachment, page 3.... |
||
|
|
|
|
#5 | ||
|
New Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 10
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
iTrader: (0)
Friends: (0)
|
Thanks everyone. Very helpful. We were wondering if just a fixed tailwheel
might have a significant impact on the Kadet's ability to have a straight takeoff roll etc. without going through the complexities of trying to rig up a steerable tailwheel ? Also we're very intrigued by the article on toe-out from gyrocptr. Never thought about that before. Again, thanks so much ! Mike Barker |
||
|
|
|
|
#6 | ||
|
Super Contributor
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Posts: 1,056
Thanked 98 Times in 96 Posts
iTrader: (1)
Friends: (3)
|
A fixed tail wheel can work fine to a point but you will have no maneuverability while it is on the ground. It does keep the plane going straight for a bit though. I have a super cub that I take off by just going full throttle. The wheel keeps it straight and once the tail lifts the rudder keeps it straight. Careful wheel alignment and rudder trim are important.
|
||
|
|
|
|
#7 | ||
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 662
Thanked 65 Times in 64 Posts
iTrader: (0)
Friends: (0)
|
I strongly disagree with the recommendation for toe-out, just the opposite has always been my experience in literally dozens of tail draggers. Toe-out will usually result in very poor take off's. On grass you will definitely benefit if you put on larger wheels. Check to make sure you do have some toe in on your model, if you do not, that may be part of your take off problems.
|
||
|
|
|
|
#8 | ||
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: West Chester PA
Posts: 41
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
iTrader: (0)
Friends: (0)
|
I'm a total newb myself but just a simple thing that comes to mind, has he made sure the landing gear isn't bent or tweaked in any way?
|
||
|
|
|
|
#9 | ||
|
Member
iTrader: (0)
Friends: (13)
|
You will find that "toe in " will help greatly. I don't believe 'toe out" will help.
Henry |
||
|
|
|
|
#10 | ||
|
Super Contributor
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Posts: 1,056
Thanked 98 Times in 96 Posts
iTrader: (1)
Friends: (3)
|
Did you guy's read the toe out article?
|
||
|
|
|
|
#12 | ||
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: near Cortland NY
Posts: 602
Thanked 35 Times in 34 Posts
iTrader: (0)
Friends: (1)
|
I think toe-in or toe-out or dead neutral, are all the right answer for different planes.
I tried all 3 on my WWI Fokker D-VII bipe, and toe-out gave a marked improvement (I added a steerable tailwheel as I often fly from pavement), more for preventing groundloops while landing than helping for takeoff, though. I think saying all tail-draggers benefit from X is akin to saying all trucks, motorhomes, and sports-cars should all have the same alignment settings. Also, the size of the wheels, the profile of the wheels, and how much give the suspension has are all factors, as well as how the toe and camber change with suspension deflection. |
||
|
Ask me why your DX5e is doomed... and how to fix it.
|
|||
|
|
|
|
#13 | ||
|
Ya got any Beeman's?
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 1,408
Thanked 147 Times in 145 Posts
Club: CVMRCC, SEFSD
iTrader: (0)
Friends: (5)
|
I'm going to go read the toe-out article, but here's what the National Association of Scale Aeromodelers has to say about it:
http://www.nasascale.org/howtos/toe-in.htm |
||
|
|
|
|
#14 | ||
|
Member
iTrader: (0)
Friends: (13)
|
In my 40 some years of working as a licensed aircraft mechanic I can't recall any airplane that required toe out when aligning the landing gear. All reduired a few degrees of toe in. http://www.checkthesock.com/pilots/Henry
|
||
|
|
|
|
#15 | ||
|
Ya got any Beeman's?
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 1,408
Thanked 147 Times in 145 Posts
Club: CVMRCC, SEFSD
iTrader: (0)
Friends: (5)
|
Hmm... The EAA article that Gyrocptr linked sure makes a logical argument in the sense of how the plane behaves when the weight of the taildragger is unbalanced to one side or the other, but then the NASA snippet I linked sounds very logical, too. I've been an A&P for oh... over 20 years, but it's always been on airliners and on the line, not real heavy checks, so I never dealt with, or even heard of any alignment issues.
Anyways, I've never had to adjust the alignment on any of my models yet. I've never had an issue with them veering due to that, just prop torque and wind. You need to do that pilot stuff! |
||
|
|
![]() |
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Problem with either LiPo's, ESC's, or BL motors... | RC Fan Chris | General Electric Discussions | 14 | 06-13-2012 02:41 PM |
| HELP!!! RX problem!! | wittpilot | General Electric Discussions | 13 | 10-11-2011 06:19 AM |
| Glitch / lock out problem!!!! | Gee | Power Systems | 20 | 04-14-2011 03:29 AM |
| Unpossible servo problem | mclarkson | RC Radios, Transmitters, Receivers, Servos, gyros | 13 | 02-13-2011 12:45 PM |
| Parkzone spitfire flight problem! Help! | CPomeroy | Beginners | 30 | 02-12-2011 08:45 AM |