| Wattflyer RC Network: RC Universe :: RCU Magazine :: RCU Forums :: RCU Classifieds :: RCU User Reviews :: RCU YouTube |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|||||||
| Register | Members List | Wattflyer Extras | Articles | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Social Groups | Photo Gallery |
| Scale E-Powered Aircraft Discuss electric powered scale models here. |
| Thank you for your support (hide ads) | |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 | ||
|
Real Flying
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 199
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Club: They cant handle it...
iTrader: (0)
Friends: (0)
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
#2 | ||
|
Super Contributor
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Aberdeen, Scotland
Posts: 2,857
Thanked 358 Times in 332 Posts
iTrader: (0)
Friends: (6)
|
That's a pretty unusual request. WWII fighter planes in general don't make great gliders, they were never designed for gliding. As a general rule if you want them to have a decent glide then keeping the model light is the most effective option.
Having said that, the WWII fighter that potentially should make just about the best glider (relative to other WWII fighters) is the Focke Wulf Ta152. This plane was designed to fly at very high altitude so had long sailplane like wings which should make it glide quite well, providing it's built light.
|
||
|
|
|
|
#3 | ||
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Southern CA
Posts: 481
Thanked 18 Times in 18 Posts
iTrader: (0)
Friends: (1)
|
You need to be more specific about what you want. If you are a beginning flyer and want to "ease into' flying warbirds, I'd recommend one of the foamy T-28's after flying a low wing model on a simulator and get instruction using a buddy box and qualified instructor. Even better, master flying a high wing tail dragger first and graduate to an easy to fly low wing foamy like the T-28.
|
||
|
|
|
|
#4 | ||
|
Augermeister
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Keller, TX
Posts: 1,799
Thanked 107 Times in 105 Posts
Club: 114th RC Aero Squadron
iTrader: (0)
Friends: (13)
|
+1 on the PZ T-28. It glides fine. Usually, I'm trying to tone down the gliding.
|
||
|
" Something Ain't Right !
"
|
|||
|
|
|
|
#5 | ||
|
Super Contributor
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Aberdeen, Scotland
Posts: 2,857
Thanked 358 Times in 332 Posts
iTrader: (0)
Friends: (6)
|
The T-28 isn't a WWII fighter. In fact it fails on both counts, it didn't fly in WWII AND it's not a fighter
|
||
|
|
|
|
#6 | ||
|
Augermeister
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Keller, TX
Posts: 1,799
Thanked 107 Times in 105 Posts
Club: 114th RC Aero Squadron
iTrader: (0)
Friends: (13)
|
Jet,
I disagree slightly. No, it wasn't produced until 1949 but it did spend some time in Vietnam, so it still can be classified as warbird: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/North_American_T-28_Trojan Okay, mainly used as a trainer but it did spend some time in harms way. My 2 pence/cents... LOL -Hawk |
||
|
" Something Ain't Right !
"
|
|||
|
|
|
|
#7 | ||
|
Super Contributor
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Aberdeen, Scotland
Posts: 2,857
Thanked 358 Times in 332 Posts
iTrader: (0)
Friends: (6)
|
I guess a 'warbird', taking the name literally, is any plane that flew in any theatre of war, so yeah, it's a 'warbird'. But the OP's request was for a WWII fighter so I'm not sure on what count you could disagree
|
||
|
|
|
|
#8 | ||
|
Augermeister
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Keller, TX
Posts: 1,799
Thanked 107 Times in 105 Posts
Club: 114th RC Aero Squadron
iTrader: (0)
Friends: (13)
|
Agreed Jet, sorry.. Clearly not WW-II vintage. It seems the T-28 in the RC World gets thrown in this category. The Chinese marketeers don't care. Throw some armament on her and she could play the part.
|
||
|
" Something Ain't Right !
"
|
|||
|
|
|
|
#9 | ||
|
Super Contrubutor
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: West Central PA
Posts: 4,112
Thanked 162 Times in 156 Posts
Club: rcg staff
iTrader: (3)
Friends: (17)
|
Originally Posted by JetPlaneFlyer
On that note the Alfas glide really well, as they are constructed from lightweight depron. Their FW190D is similar to a TA152.
|
||
|
|
|
|
#10 | ||
|
Ya got any Beeman's?
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 1,398
Thanked 147 Times in 145 Posts
Club: CVMRCC, SEFSD
iTrader: (0)
Friends: (5)
|
My PZ Corsair (Version 1) can fly at a crawl, and it has the weight of added retracts. I darn near hover it at altitude into the wind. Don't know how their new version behaves.
|
||
|
|
|
|
#11 | ||
|
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 3
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
iTrader: (0)
Friends: (0)
|
Originally Posted by JetPlaneFlyer
Awesome.This is nice model which you show.I like this model. my brother fly F/A-18E 64mm Tiger PNP Version EDF RC Jet.The F/A-18 known as the Hornet is a supersonic, all-weather, carrier-capable, multirole fighter jet.
|
||
|
|
|
|
#12 | ||
|
Super Contributor
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Posts: 1,051
Thanked 98 Times in 96 Posts
iTrader: (1)
Friends: (3)
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
#13 | ||
|
Super Contributor
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Aberdeen, Scotland
Posts: 2,857
Thanked 358 Times in 332 Posts
iTrader: (0)
Friends: (6)
|
Originally Posted by Turner
I think the model comes from this kit: http://mcmodels.free.fr/TA_152_model.html
I do also have a couple of old balsa plans for the Ta152 in my plan stash... find attached. |
||
|
|
|
|
#14 | ||
|
Super Contributor
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Posts: 1,051
Thanked 98 Times in 96 Posts
iTrader: (1)
Friends: (3)
|
Interesting kit but far too rich for my budget.
Thanks for the plans. May consider building something like this someday. I've always thought the 190 was one of the most beautiful single engine planes. |
||
|
|
|
|
#15 | ||
|
Ya got any Beeman's?
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 1,398
Thanked 147 Times in 145 Posts
Club: CVMRCC, SEFSD
iTrader: (0)
Friends: (5)
|
So the op never came back with any feedback. I wonder what he's planning on doing with a good gliding WWII fighter? Slope soar? Just looking for some trivia? ??
|
||
|
|
![]() |
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|