Wattflyer RC Network: RC Universe :: RCU Magazine :: RCU Forums :: RCU Classifieds :: RCU User Reviews :: RCU YouTube
Home Who's Online Calendar Today's Posts RealTime Post Spy Mark Forums Read
Go Back   WattFlyer RC Electric Flight Forums - Discuss radio control eflight > Electric R/C Airplanes > General Electric Discussions
Register Members List Wattflyer Extras Articles Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Social Groups

General Electric Discussions Talk about topics related to e-powered RC flying

Thank you for your support (hide ads)
 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 05-10-2014, 08:28 AM   #1
thepiper92
Warbird Fanatic
 
thepiper92's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Winnipeg, Canada
Posts: 1,228
Thanked 27 Times in 26 Posts
iTrader: (0)
Friends: (4)
Default Using Motocalc

So I was playing around with Motocalc, came to around 17oz for empty weight of the P47. I don't have a scale that can measure it properly, but I took the max of what the plane likely would be (24 oz) and subtracted the weight of the battery, motor and esc. No specs on area of wing, but it is somewhere around 300sq in I gather (the Mini Switch is around 170, and the the P47 has a larger span and clearly a larger area distance from the leading to trailing edge. Putting it at 250 changes results very little. I found the specs for the motor, an RCtimer 2830/11 1000kV, including resistance, weight. I also found the specs for the battery, although under cell weight, I gather the program asks for individual cell, so I divided the weight by 3 for the battery. The results that I got were stall speed until 18mph, level flight at clopt=0.53 25mph (whatever that means), 29mph level flight at Cl=0.4 and a max airspeed of 44mph. Now, my specs are obviously not accurate completely. I know how to find the wing area, but it isn't that far off. As for weight, that may make a difference, but I'm thinking of the answer to my question: Does the front end of the P47 really suck the plane back that much, or am I running much too heavy (not sure what it would be other than 2 retracts, and a bit of extra sheeting on the wings). These results are a 10x6 prop. All going up to a 10x8 prop does is increase the top speed to 53mph, would this have helped me quite a bit you think? I would have achieved the 10x6 max airspeed at 75% throttle according to this. Now here is what I am confused about, an 11x8 prop has nothing different than a 10x8 prop...what does that mean? I really want to get down to figuring this prop stuff out, I am tired of crashing because of screw ups on my part of installing the wrong props. My own flying mistakes, that is fine, but not mistakes before I fly.
thepiper92 is offline  
  Reply With Quote
 

  WattFlyer RC Electric Flight Forums - Discuss radio control eflight > Electric R/C Airplanes > General Electric Discussions

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Motocalc Update from 8.07 to 8.08 kyleservicetech Company Discussions 17 10-23-2013 12:45 AM
Top Flite SE5a power suggestions? Tarasdad WWI Era 22 10-14-2013 07:04 AM
MotoCalc & ProJet MQ-9 Reaper Drone bsrchas Power Systems 0 02-11-2012 08:06 PM
How accurate is MotoCalc? ikarus_dm Power Systems 18 03-28-2011 03:15 AM
Just downloaded MotoCalc! FlyWheel General Electric Discussions 7 01-25-2011 07:30 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:57 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2005 WattfFlyer.com
RCU Eflight HQ

Charities we support Select: Yorkie Rescue  ::  Crohn's & Colitis Foundation



Page generated in 0.84420 seconds with 100 queries