| Wattflyer RC Network: RC Universe :: RCU Magazine :: RCU Forums :: RCU Classifieds :: RCU User Reviews :: RCU YouTube |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|||||||
| Register | Members List | Wattflyer Extras | Articles | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Social Groups | Photo Gallery |
| Delta & Flying Wings Discuss electric powered delta (flying wing) style aircraft here. |
| Thank you for your support (hide ads) | |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#151 | ||
|
Mr. ExperiMENTAL
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Newark DE
Posts: 467
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
iTrader: (0)
Friends: (0)
|
Tips |
||
|
|
|
|
#152 | ||
|
Super Awesome
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Detroit
Posts: 1,159
Thanked 24 Times in 24 Posts
iTrader: (0)
Friends: (0)
|
I think i am going to with;
Himax 2825-2700 ThunderPower 11.1v 2100mah and swing a 6 x 5.5 prop seems like a good set up to start with. |
||
|
4-27-2006 Stryker B
6-05-2006 PKZ FW190 Brushless 8-25-2006 Stryker C 9-27-2006 Typhoon 3D 3-28-2007 PKZ Spitfire Brushless 4-28-2007 FunJet 9-06-2007 Kyosho F-16 10-21-2007 Phase3 F-16 |
|||
|
|
|
|
#153 | ||
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 160
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
iTrader: (0)
Friends: (0)
|
Hawk, setup sounds hard on the battery. The prop size was wrong on your previous post on the Himaxx motor, try calculating with the 6x5.5 prop.
Should be a speedy setup if the battery is up to it. |
||
|
|
|
|
#154 | ||
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 745
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
iTrader: (0)
Friends: (0)
|
I have been told that "a good motor, like a Mega, will use roughly 150 mAH less juice and have the same output. Himaxx will take that extra juice and due to low efficiency, it will turn it into heat and try to self distruct over time."
Really, I can't speak for Himax since I have never owned one but I would invite anybody familiar with both to speak to whether the Megas are superior from an efficiency and "taking abuse" point of view. |
||
|
|
|
|
#155 | ||
|
Super Awesome
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Detroit
Posts: 1,159
Thanked 24 Times in 24 Posts
iTrader: (0)
Friends: (0)
|
I am sorry i put the wrong prop size. i intend on using a 5x5.5 not a 6x5.5.
Do you really think that the mega is that much better of a choice? I haven't bought the motor yet but that is what i was looking at getting. Look at these numbers and tell me if they sit any better with the different prop. ![]() I didn't see a mega motor with a 2650kv. Which one were u looking at? BTW moonwalker i made u a custom avitar: ![]() lol |
||
|
4-27-2006 Stryker B
6-05-2006 PKZ FW190 Brushless 8-25-2006 Stryker C 9-27-2006 Typhoon 3D 3-28-2007 PKZ Spitfire Brushless 4-28-2007 FunJet 9-06-2007 Kyosho F-16 10-21-2007 Phase3 F-16 |
|||
|
|
|
|
#156 | ||
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 160
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
iTrader: (0)
Friends: (0)
|
Looks like a good choice.
|
||
|
|
|
|
#157 | ||
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 745
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
iTrader: (0)
Friends: (0)
|
Thanks for the Avitar!
The Mega is the speed 480 size motor which is a little heavier than the speed 400 sizes (16/15/x). It is MEGA 16/25/2 (2650KV). Been told this thing can take a royal beating and put out almost 1600 watts. It cost 10 bucks more than the speed 400 size. |
||
|
|
|
|
#158 | ||
|
Super Awesome
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Detroit
Posts: 1,159
Thanked 24 Times in 24 Posts
iTrader: (0)
Friends: (0)
|
Ok from what i can find out that mega 16/25/2 is about 1.3 oz heavier. But my calculator doesn't have that motor in there for me to run any numbers.
np on the avitar i made it for fun, i'll make one for anyone else who wants one, just ask. |
||
|
4-27-2006 Stryker B
6-05-2006 PKZ FW190 Brushless 8-25-2006 Stryker C 9-27-2006 Typhoon 3D 3-28-2007 PKZ Spitfire Brushless 4-28-2007 FunJet 9-06-2007 Kyosho F-16 10-21-2007 Phase3 F-16 |
|||
|
|
|
|
#159 | ||
|
Banned
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 31
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
iTrader: (0)
Friends: (0)
|
DH, What program is that?
|
||
|
|
|
|
#160 | ||
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 745
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
iTrader: (0)
Friends: (0)
|
I found the following info on the motor. http://www.megamotorusa.com/Brushles...5-2.htm?id=406
Based on this info the following rough guess can be made: 3S with 5X5 prop will hit 116mph and draw 30 amps 4S with 4.7X4.2 will hit 139.2mph and draw 35 amps
|
||
|
|
|
|
#161 | ||
|
Super Contributor
iTrader: (0)
Friends: (4)
|
DH,
I own 5 Himax motors and have been very happy with them, However I purchased a Mega 16-25-3 1700 KV and it is a rocket!!! It pushed my 30+ oz. V- Diamond to 97 MPH in level flight with a 6X5.5 prop on a Hyperion 2100 Mah 4S pack. It preforms very well also on 3S [sorry, I didn't get any radar data on the 3S set up but its fast] with a 7X5 and the thrust is awsome, unlimited verticle. That might be the sweet motor in the Fun Jet for those who want WARP speed. Just think how much faster the FJ will be compaired to a 30 oz. V-Diamond [with LG hanging down in the air streem] with that Mega, Hummmmm. Who cares if you need to add a little weight to the nose to hit the CG!!! I'm told you can run that Mega at 600 watts and more just by adding a simple heat sink, which I have added to mine. No hot motor upon landing and a cooler motor is a happy motor. I'm going to try my 2815-3000 Himax [with heat sink] in mine 1st but I know I'll end up with the Mega in there. I don't want to rob the V-D of its motor, but I might have to........... CTD |
||
|
|
|
|
#162 | ||
|
Super Awesome
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Detroit
Posts: 1,159
Thanked 24 Times in 24 Posts
iTrader: (0)
Friends: (0)
|
no program just a free link;
http://brantuas.com/ezcalc/dma1.asp CTD: Do you think that the 3 turn is a better choice then the 4 turn? (16/15/3 or 16/15/4) What do you think of the 16/25/2 that moonwalker was talking about? |
||
|
4-27-2006 Stryker B
6-05-2006 PKZ FW190 Brushless 8-25-2006 Stryker C 9-27-2006 Typhoon 3D 3-28-2007 PKZ Spitfire Brushless 4-28-2007 FunJet 9-06-2007 Kyosho F-16 10-21-2007 Phase3 F-16 |
|||
|
|
|
|
#163 | ||
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 204
Thanked 6 Times in 4 Posts
iTrader: (0)
Friends: (1)
|
DetroitHawk
I see in your calculations that you are using a very high pitch prop which provides very little in-flight thrust. One of the problems you are going to run into is that at higher speeds the resistance to go faster increases. You may need to use a prop with at least a 1 size larger diameter than pitch in order to overcome that resistance and give you more vertical. Finding a setup to give you 100mph pitch speed this way uses a lot more power as you will see, but it may be required to get to that point. |
||
|
|
|
|
#164 | ||
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 745
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
iTrader: (0)
Friends: (0)
|
Hawk:
This one looks good too - seems VERY efficient but also costs $$$$$ Ran the numbers on 400-23 with 5X5.5 and it looks good over 100 mph pitch speed with low amp draw. (2300kv) 400-28 (2800kv) will give you another 14 mph at the expense of another 10 amps. Both weigh same as others you are considering. I may go for this motor for the Funjet as it seems I can just use my CC 25 and now have to go bigger on the ESC for 3 cells. |
||
|
|
|
|
#165 | ||
|
Super Awesome
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Detroit
Posts: 1,159
Thanked 24 Times in 24 Posts
iTrader: (0)
Friends: (0)
|
|
||
|
4-27-2006 Stryker B
6-05-2006 PKZ FW190 Brushless 8-25-2006 Stryker C 9-27-2006 Typhoon 3D 3-28-2007 PKZ Spitfire Brushless 4-28-2007 FunJet 9-06-2007 Kyosho F-16 10-21-2007 Phase3 F-16 |
|||
|
|
|
|
#166 | ||
|
Super Awesome
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Detroit
Posts: 1,159
Thanked 24 Times in 24 Posts
iTrader: (0)
Friends: (0)
|
![]() 7x9 prop i found on the tower hobby site is interesting too. The amps are low for the high output. http://www2.towerhobbies.com/cgi-bin...?&I=LX1512&P=7 |
||
|
4-27-2006 Stryker B
6-05-2006 PKZ FW190 Brushless 8-25-2006 Stryker C 9-27-2006 Typhoon 3D 3-28-2007 PKZ Spitfire Brushless 4-28-2007 FunJet 9-06-2007 Kyosho F-16 10-21-2007 Phase3 F-16 |
|||
|
|
|
|
#167 | ||
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 745
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
iTrader: (0)
Friends: (0)
|
Hawk:
Using what you have on hand as a start seems like a good idea. I have decided to go with the Mega long can 480 size motor. It is about the same weight as the Himax but can take much more abuse from what I have read so far. From a raw efficiency perspective, keeping it light with 3S is probably the way to go but I want to set one up with crazy power just for the challenge of stuffing as much stuff into it that I can and seeing if I can fly it well. |
||
|
|
|
|
#168 | ||
|
Super Contributor
iTrader: (0)
Friends: (4)
|
Originally Posted by DetroitHawk
I'm not sure which motor would be the best. I'll have to see the airframe in the flesh. I would lean towards the 16-15-3 or the 16-15-4 I havn't seen too many people running that 2 wind Mega. The 16-15-4 would be a natural cause you can run larger props for more thrust on both 3S and 4S packs. 6X5.5 is great on 3S, tons of thrust and good speed.
CTD |
||
|
|
|
|
#169 | ||
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 160
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
iTrader: (0)
Friends: (0)
|
CTD is right, if I had to pick just one it would be the 4wind. 3s is light and still capable of unlimited vertical and 4s is quite a bit faster. 6x4 or 6x5.5 prop and a 1800-2600mah battery allows quite alot of flexibility.
I would like to try the long can 480 style mega though just for fun. HET has the 2w-20 700 watt motor, might make a nice choice too. |
||
|
|
|
|
#170 | ||
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 745
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
iTrader: (0)
Friends: (0)
|
Hawk:
I would guess it depends what you want to accomplish with this bird. My little 13 ounce Microjet was dopplered at 134km per hour (83mph) this week on that little Parkzone 1880kv motor with a 4.75X4.75 APC(e). It has a little 3 ounce 1320mah and is really a fun little thing to run around the local park with, go straight up in a crazy barrel roll and just cruise around. If that is the goal, then those Mega 400 sizes would be fine as I find my 16/15/4 comparable with the 1880kv motor (a little quicker). BUT, if you want to run that Funjet to crazy screaming mental case speeds of 120mph plus, then I have been told to stay away from 400 size brushless motors, because, as the amps go higher and higher they become more and more inefficient and therefore waste more and more energy into heat. They are more suited for max aerobatics and low stall speeds, but they save you only a few dollars. For reference, there is a group of guys over on RC universe that are using long can Megas with 800-1200 watts to push Strykers up to 120mph. http://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/m_37...tm.htm#5015873 My goal will be to use a similar power system to see how far it will push the Funjet. The two set-ups of choice appear to be: Mega 16/25/3 (1700kv) with 5 or 6 cells or Mega 16/25/2 (2650kv) with 3 or 4 cells For a video of the former with 5 cells check out Dialed Chuck's video of his Ritewing Demon at a whopping 50 ounces at post 422: http://www.wattflyer.com/forums/show...t=8302&page=17 |
||
|
|
|
|
#171 | ||
|
Super Contributor
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Utica Illinois
Posts: 1,050
Thanked 15 Times in 15 Posts
iTrader: (1)
Friends: (5)
|
Got the shipping confirmation from my distributor today; FunJets are on the way
I'm gonna go with the Mega 16/25/3 on 4S with a Graupner 6.5x6.5 speed prop. 37 amps and around 500 watts I think you guys will find that the 16/25/2 on 4S will have a lot higher amp draw than your calc. program is comming up with (hope I'm wrong but would like to see the results. I'll knock a couple bucks off on a 16/25/2 to the first guy who wants to try one! (send me a PM) Randy Dynamo Electrics |
||
|
|
|
|
#172 | ||
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 745
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
iTrader: (0)
Friends: (0)
|
I bought the Mega 15/25/3 as well. I plan on testing all types of prop combos on it on 4S, 5S and 6S with my new meter and will report back the results here when it comes in.
Randy, what is your best guess as to terminal MPH straight and level on the Funjet with that motor, the 6.5X6.5 speed prop and 4S? |
||
|
|
|
|
#173 | ||
|
Super Contributor
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Utica Illinois
Posts: 1,050
Thanked 15 Times in 15 Posts
iTrader: (1)
Friends: (5)
|
I haven't had one in my hands yet so hard to tell!
I had the same set up on a Twin Jet and it did 137 flat out. What was cool about it was the climb rate, didn't seem to slow down much even while going straight up Randy |
||
|
|
![]() |
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| HELP no fun w/ fun jet | sheldo78 | Pusher Park Jets | 15 | 10-14-2008 05:27 AM |
| funjet | jabba1 | Pusher Park Jets | 5 | 10-11-2008 12:54 PM |
| Funjet-Jet Fun... | Elfwreck | Delta & Flying Wings | 6 | 03-25-2008 11:20 PM |
| Funjet Help | wolftg | Delta & Flying Wings | 1 | 04-27-2007 12:25 PM |
| What's fun? and/or when does the fun begin? | rocket_jim | Beginners | 76 | 07-16-2006 11:29 PM |