Wattflyer RC Network: RC Universe :: RCU Magazine :: RCU Forums :: RCU Classifieds :: RCU User Reviews :: RCU YouTube
Home Who's Online Calendar Today's Posts RealTime Post Spy Mark Forums Read
Go Back   WattFlyer RC Electric Flight Forums - Discuss radio control eflight > Electric Helicopters > Multi-Rotors
Register Members List Wattflyer Extras Articles Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Social Groups

Multi-Rotors Discuss your quad copters and other multi engined choppers here.

Thank you for your support (hide ads)
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-21-2014, 12:44 AM   #1
Behold The Renaissance
pizzano's Avatar
Join Date: May 2012
Location: So. Calif
Posts: 2,037
Thanked 130 Times in 128 Posts
iTrader: (0)
Friends: (3)
Default NTSB Ruling on Unmanned Aircraft Enforcement

News that AMA just published....a better late than never....

NTSB judge rules FAA ban on commercial UAS/Drones unenforceable

Quad copter flown at the International Consumer Electronics Show, 1/8/2014 (AP Photo/Jae C Hong)

In a ruling late Thursday, 3/6, NTSB Administrative Law Judge Patrick Geraghty ruled that the FAA policy banning the commercial operation of unmanned aircraft is “non-binding”, hence unenforceable. The judge found that the policy wasn’t written as part of a formal rulemaking process and the FAA hadn’t complied with the requirements of the Administrative Procedures Act. The FAA policy was published in the Federal Register in 2007 and has effectively banned the operation of commercial and public use UAS in the national airspace over the past seven years.
This finding came as part of the judge ‘s ruling on attorney Brendan Schulman’s motion to dismiss FAA’s Order of Assessment against Raphael Pirker, aka “Trappy”. Mr. Pirker was fined $10,000 by the FAA under 14 CFR 91.13 for allegedly operating an aircraft in a careless and reckless manner while flying a UAS through the University of Virginia campus in Charlottesville, Virginia.
This ruling effectively lifts the ban on the commercial operation of small unmanned aircraft, those aircraft that would otherwise meet the description of a model aircraft.
It’s a bit too soon to say how the FAA will respond to the ruling, or what this means to the UAS community. But, by all accounts, this is a game changer.
pizzano is offline  
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-22-2014, 02:16 AM   #2
Ochroma Pyramidale Tekton
FlyWheel's Avatar
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Blackstock, South Carolina
Posts: 2,976
View FlyWheel's Gallery5
Thanked 80 Times in 78 Posts
Club: Lancaster County Fliers
iTrader: (0)
Friends: (5)

Good thing their is an AMA to defend us.


OK, I got my "drone licence"...
When does the season start and what Ammo can I use?
FlyWheel is offline  
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-22-2014, 03:04 AM   #3
Behold The Renaissance
pizzano's Avatar
Join Date: May 2012
Location: So. Calif
Posts: 2,037
Thanked 130 Times in 128 Posts
iTrader: (0)
Friends: (3)

Like in, right is tight...left is loose.....?.....
pizzano is offline  
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-22-2014, 03:16 AM   #4
Super Contributor
solentlife's Avatar
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Ex UK Brit now in Latvia west coast - Ventspils
Posts: 9,921
View solentlife's Gallery47
Thanked 449 Times in 442 Posts
Club: Founder Member Ventspils RC Club. Ex Waltham Chase and Meon Valley Soaring.
Awards Showcase

Scratchbuilders Award  Scratchbuilders Award  Outstanding Contributor Award  125mph Speed Demon 
iTrader: (0)
Friends: (19)

As I have posted in another thread on this ...

a) I hate do-gooders who use the law to break sentences ...

b) Trappy needs to be hung out to dry so modellers do not suffer further risks of law-makers creating restrictive rules ..

c) I would put money on the table - the judge if asked privately probably thinks he has to rule because of the laws - NOT because he thinks it's wrong.

It is seen often that Govt agencies tend to act as though THEY are the law and stretch the rules ... and I agree that they need reminding and pulling back.
But this affair has another side to the coin - the effects this ruling may have on other idiots like Trappy. He and others may now go out and sooner or later something will happen ... and I hope and pray that no-one is hurt.

I think the modelling community needs to stand up and make it known that we are not the idiots Trappy and his like show others.

Bad day in my view ... and I don't live of fly in USA ... but things like this tend to stray across borders and affect other authorities judgements ...


222kph PKJ,EDF Concorde, Mini4,Mig3,T45,PKJ twin,ME109,Edge540,Cessna182,Skymaster Biplane,F15,F16,Badius,Ultimate,SE5,Qbee10,450 Heli,V911,J3 Cub Founder 9x forum: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Flysky_RC_radio/
- Subscribe my Youtube: "solentlifeuk"
solentlife is online now  
  Reply With Quote

  WattFlyer RC Electric Flight Forums - Discuss radio control eflight > Electric Helicopters > Multi-Rotors

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
"Trappy" gets slapped with a $10K fine! Nitro Blast UAV / FPV 179 01-08-2016 01:58 PM
$75.00 Build Contest, Unique, Seldom Built Flying Aircraft Starts Dec.1 2013 CHELLIE Scratch and Kit Built Aircraft 24 02-16-2014 05:00 PM
Longe range High altitude Rocket boosted UAV cmccully UAV / FPV 43 11-22-2013 10:19 PM
FY 30-A Hypnotic effect.... Nitro Blast 3D Flying 36 07-02-2012 10:30 PM
Boeing X45 Unmanned Aircraft, Tetris, Bukvorez qwerty1000 ParkFlyers 10 10-07-2011 06:10 PM

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:58 PM.

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2016, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2005 WattfFlyer.com
RCU Eflight HQ

Charities we support Select: Yorkie Rescue  ::  Crohn's & Colitis Foundation

Page generated in 0.06909 seconds with 27 queries