ParkFlyers Talk about all backyard and parkflyer aircraft here

Thunder Tiger Japanese ZERO

Old 09-02-2011, 07:29 PM
  #1  
guapoman2000
Space Ship 1
Thread Starter
 
guapoman2000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Orlando, Florida, USA
Posts: 1,406
Thumbs up Thunder Tiger Japanese ZERO

Hi Guys!

Since my goals are to setup my new Thunder Tiger as a typical Park Flyer and most especially fly it scale like even though it came with a very capable Brushless Outrunner motor, I decided to open the thread here as it will be a Park Flyer and it will fly in a Park and of course my RC Club when the grass field be recently cut!!!

Nothing to be disappointed here of my unpacking of my brand new Thunder Tiger Japanese ZERO! A typical packing job by Thunder Tiger and Tower as the model came in a larger box and the inner box from Thunder Tiger was SEALED with their special round seal marker adhesive decal.

The model was expertly packaged and nothing, I mean NOTHING was damaged, nicked, dented nor molested in any way!

The Paint job and density of the FOAM was EXCELLENT for a EPS foam model and super light. I did not see any voids, low spots nor bubbles of any kind.

Again the paint job is 1st Rate!!!

I have several pictures and the last few are with the GWS Japanese ZERO product.

























guapoman2000 is offline  
Old 10-29-2011, 06:42 PM
  #2  
captdave221
New Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Belleville, Il.
Posts: 1
Default

I had one of these in the air for about 10 seconds before the Kamakazi pilot crashed it into the side of my brick house. Total loss except for the motor. Don't think I'll buy another one.


captdave221 is offline  
Old 10-30-2011, 12:37 AM
  #3  
Monterey10
Member
 
Monterey10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Capitola Vilage
Posts: 98
Default Zero

I have one in the box, so I'm watching your thread. From what I've read, they have a particularly vicious torque roll on hand launch.
Monterey10 is offline  
Old 10-30-2011, 12:42 AM
  #4  
guapoman2000
Space Ship 1
Thread Starter
 
guapoman2000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Orlando, Florida, USA
Posts: 1,406
Default

Originally Posted by Monterey10 View Post
I have one in the box, so I'm watching your thread. From what I've read, they have a particularly vicious torque roll on hand launch.
I will try and not to put too much Throttle on Take-Off to avoid the vicious torque roll. Additionally, I will be placing some additional Right Thrust and Down Thrust to off-set any high RPM P-Factor on take-off.

Carlos
guapoman2000 is offline  
Old 02-21-2018, 03:02 PM
  #5  
Seattle
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Seattle
Posts: 37
Default

7 years ago...tales from the crypt, eh?

Weird thing is, I just obtained a ThunderTiger Zero from a guy on Ebay. Just like the lighter green one in Carlos' photos. Unbuilt. Like a time capsule.


Is anyone old enough to remember these? I love the size, but will it fly?
Seattle is offline  
Old 03-11-2018, 10:51 AM
  #6  
F22trainer
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: Sun City, Az
Posts: 278
Default

Originally Posted by Seattle View Post
7 years ago...tales from the crypt, eh?

Weird thing is, I just obtained a ThunderTiger Zero from a guy on Ebay. Just like the lighter green one in Carlos' photos. Unbuilt. Like a time capsule.


Is anyone old enough to remember these? I love the size, but will it fly?
I remember the brand - even though my RC days had gone on hiatus, I built 9 of the 25 Trainer models from them for some exhibits that featured a working/flying RC model in a large glass box.
Glad to see you picked that one up - I'll bet a gyro might help with the 'left turning tendencies'.
Good luck with it and share the fun with us.
F22trainer is offline  
Old 03-12-2018, 06:55 AM
  #7  
Seattle
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Seattle
Posts: 37
Default

Wow. You built a lot of these.

This old Thundertiger Zero really seems to be a relic. And not one that is fondly remembered.

Maybe the size and shape are the best things about it. Why not take those and leave the rest behind? Here's what I'm getting at.

The parts are simple, with no undercuts, so they would work as plugs for rigid moldmaking. I used to do a lot of fiberglass work. I could use some plaster to make up a set of molds. Then I can lay up thin parts from light fiberglass cloth and resin, using wax and PVA as a release agent. If the fiberglass version was very light behind the wing, that could make a big difference in all up weight. Little nose weight needed. But a gyro might be best all the same.

What do you guys think?
Seattle is offline  
Old 03-13-2018, 01:40 PM
  #8  
Seattle
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Seattle
Posts: 37
Default

Crickets...
Seattle is offline  
Old 03-13-2018, 02:20 PM
  #9  
F22trainer
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: Sun City, Az
Posts: 278
Default

No experience with molding fiberglass...
Sounds like work.
F22trainer is offline  
Old 03-14-2018, 04:02 PM
  #10  
Seattle
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Seattle
Posts: 37
Default

It is a bit of work alright. But if it leads to a good flying small zero, it might be worth it. And spare parts would be no problem- just make another one from the molds.
Seattle is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
mclarkson
General Electric Discussions
43
10-21-2012 12:23 AM
flyingbumma
Batteries and Chargers Forsale/WTB
5
10-21-2011 11:51 PM
Henry111
Airplanes - Electric For Sale & WTB
3
07-25-2011 03:07 AM
Nieuport Fly Guy
Beginners
24
07-02-2011 11:27 PM
Merritt
Power Systems
10
01-30-2011 09:07 PM

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Quick Reply: Thunder Tiger Japanese ZERO


Contact Us Archive Advertising Cookie Policy Privacy Statement Terms of Service

Copyright 2018 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.

Page generated in 0.07299 seconds with 13 queries