Wattflyer RC Network: RC Universe :: RCU Magazine :: RCU Forums :: RCU Classifieds :: RCU User Reviews :: RCU YouTube
Home Who's Online Calendar Today's Posts RealTime Post Spy Mark Forums Read
Go Back   WattFlyer RC Electric Flight Forums - Discuss radio control eflight > Electric R/C Airplanes > Scale E-Powered Aircraft
Register Members List Wattflyer Extras Articles Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Social Groups

Scale E-Powered Aircraft Discuss electric powered scale models here.

Thank you for your support (hide ads)
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-04-2018, 08:06 PM   #1
AusterMark1
New Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2018
Posts: 7
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
iTrader: (0)
Friends: (0)
Default Help for a beginner ?

Could someone advise me, as a complete beginner to this field ...

how realistic is it to contemplate building a "replica" biplane (a Fokker D.VII would be a good example) that is capable of maintaining flight at a scale of (wait for it!) 1:72

My limited understanding of aerodynamics and the basic principles of flight lead me to think it could only be achieved with an uaw of around 10 grams. In the worst case scenario I could accept a ""tethered" flight rather than active control surfaces ...

P.S. If anyone is interested, my nickname derives from the fact that my late father flew an Auster (652 AOP Squadron) in the Second World War ...

Kind regards to all. Roger.
AusterMark1 is offline  
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2018, 12:53 PM   #2
quorneng
Super Contributor
 
quorneng's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Cheshire, UK
Posts: 1,783
Thanked 87 Times in 83 Posts
Club: A lone flyer!
Awards Showcase

Scratchbuilders Award  Scratchbuilders Award 
iTrader: (0)
Friends: (6)
Default

Almost anything is possible but to build a RC plane at such a small scale requires particular building skills and very specialised (thus relatively expensive!) RC equipment.

I am sure the advice would be to start larger (4 times?) and work down.
quorneng is offline  
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2018, 01:32 PM   #3
AusterMark1
New Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2018
Posts: 7
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
iTrader: (0)
Friends: (0)
Default 1:72 replica model ...

Thank you so much for the warning !

Sadly, a larger scale is not an option. To be precise ...

My interest is not "mainstream" micro RC flying. Rather, I would like to build an "animated diorama" of the Western Front, in which I have low-flying aircraft. That is the reason I am willing to accept "tethered flight" (i.e. flying simple orbits) as opposed to full RC control.

Perhaps this is not the best forum, but the basic flight principles must be the same. My start point is a miniature 3.7V motor unit and Lipo battery. For a scale diameter propeller I'm guessing it will have to be coarse pitched and driven straight off the motor shaft. In any event, I'm guessing this will have to be an entirely empirical design, using sheet and stick balsa in the first instance, with some form of "test rig" just to verify whether such a model can achieve enough lift for straight and level flight ...

Ho hum, I'm 7 years retired, so I can afford to play!

So far I have only found one relevant "hit" online, of a P.51 Mustang that had something like a 4 inch wingspan, but with no information on how this was achieved ...

Cheers! Roger.
AusterMark1 is offline  
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2018, 06:29 PM   #4
quorneng
Super Contributor
 
quorneng's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Cheshire, UK
Posts: 1,783
Thanked 87 Times in 83 Posts
Club: A lone flyer!
Awards Showcase

Scratchbuilders Award  Scratchbuilders Award 
iTrader: (0)
Friends: (6)
Default

Roger
Sorry to be a bit negative but "the basic flight principles must be the same" is not quite true. At such a small scale air behaves rather differently.

My suggestion would be to undertake some experiments.
Build a scale 1/72 something as light as you can but as a glider and see if you can get it to glide is a reasonably stable manner with weights added to equal that of the motor and LiPo. I suspect it is easier to say than do!
At the same time test to see how much thrust the motor/LiPo combination with a scale? prop actually produces.
I may be wrong but my own guess is it will small indeed and nowhere near the level you will need which will be close to the total weight of the plane. The reason for this is at such a small size air is relatively 'sticky' so a plane needs substantial thrust just move it fast enough through the air to create the lift to match its weight.

For a diorama you could of course 'cheat' a bit and use 'supported' model planes. They can still move but don't have to actually fly.
quorneng is offline  
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-2018, 02:07 AM   #5
Stick Dude
Member
 
Stick Dude's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Dfw Texas
Posts: 153
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Club: Ill try to become a member of a local rc club...
iTrader: (0)
Friends: (1)
Default

I have a small Fokker tri plane its a foamy, I just purchased and will be schooled on a nice electric stick, it has the same paint job as the Fokker, nice, im not sure about the plane you described, but I bet its pretty cool. My pop flew this beauty in Nam, totally effective!


Attached Images
File Type: jpg 368_b_aircraft_0.jpg (32.3 KB, 76 views)
Stick Dude is offline  
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-2018, 12:17 PM   #6
ron_van_sommeren
homo ludens modelisticus
 
ron_van_sommeren's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: near Nijmegen, Nederland
Posts: 969
Thanked 187 Times in 166 Posts
Club: www.rmvc-cumulus.nl
iTrader: (0)
Friends: (0)
Default

Originally Posted by quorneng View Post
... Sorry to be a bit negative but "the basic flight principles must be the same" is not quite true. At such a small scale air behaves rather differently. ...
E.g. insects don't fly, they swim in the air
Reynolds_number (wikipedia)

Vriendelijke groeten Ron
Without a watt-meter you are in the dark, until something starts to glow
e-flight calculators watt-meters diy motor tips Cumulus MFC
ron_van_sommeren is offline  
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-2018, 12:50 PM   #7
AusterMark1
New Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2018
Posts: 7
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
iTrader: (0)
Friends: (0)
Default

Dankie waal, meneer (and apologies for my spelling).

I shall read and inwardly digest the Wiki article on Reynolds number. I am slightly ashamed to have forgotten this, having read Engineering at Cambridge, albeit 54 years ago!

So, you are from Nijmegen. I mentioned that my father was an AOP pilot, flying an Auster in WW2. He was actually shot down in November 1944, "belly landing" in what I think is called De Groote Peel. Spent a couple of months in a hospital in Eindhoven, before being repatriated to a hospital in UK. I'll try and attach a photo of him taken in Normandy, standing on the wheel of his Auster ...

Dooi! Roger.
AusterMark1 is offline  
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-2018, 01:29 PM   #8
AusterMark1
New Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2018
Posts: 7
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
iTrader: (0)
Friends: (0)
Default

To my friends in Chester, Texas, and Nijmegen -

I've just remembered that, buried somewhere in my loft space, I have a fascinating 30-year-old book on the subject of "flight", written by a Professor of Aeronautics from Amsterdam University, that examined the entire subject from insect flight and bird flight through to modern aircraft. It contained dozens of equations and semi-empirical graphs that showed the commonalities. Ron - as a Nederlander, does this ring any bells?

The suggestion that I first attempt a gliding model is a good one, but I still wonder if a seriously fast and coarse-pitched propeller might generate enough airflow to overcome the "stickiness" over the lift surfaces ...

I'm now waiting on delivery of a 1:72 Fokker D.VII plastic kit that I can use as a set of templates for a balsa and/or foam model. Tbc !
AusterMark1 is offline  
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-2018, 01:43 PM   #9
AusterMark1
New Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2018
Posts: 7
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
iTrader: (0)
Friends: (0)
Default

So, let's see if the attachment works this time!


Attached Images
File Type: jpg Normandy Auster.jpg (341.7 KB, 66 views)
AusterMark1 is offline  
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-2018, 06:32 PM   #10
ron_van_sommeren
homo ludens modelisticus
 
ron_van_sommeren's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: near Nijmegen, Nederland
Posts: 969
Thanked 187 Times in 166 Posts
Club: www.rmvc-cumulus.nl
iTrader: (0)
Friends: (0)
Default

Originally Posted by AusterMark1 View Post
... I have a fascinating 30-year-old book on the subject of "flight", written by a Professor of Aeronautics from Amsterdam University, that examined the entire subject from insect flight and bird flight through to modern aircraft....
I have it here, it taught me about 'swimming' insects, and a lot more. I also learned how much jars of peanutbutter-energy it takes for a 747 to fly from Amsterdam to New York.



747 fans, and RC pilots, should read The Simple Science of Flight. The title says it all, but Henk is also a 747 aficionado and has dedicated a whole chapter to that plane. Why it was exactly the plane needed for transatlantic flight.

I have the Dutch version, easy to read, funny at times, lovely examples, no differential/integral math, a joy to read. Of course the English version can't be but less funny than the Dutch version After all, Dutch is the language of poets and diplomats.


An excellent and humorous must read for modellers.
Henk Tennekes was a.o. professor of Aeronautical Engineering at Pennsylvania State University.
Henk Tennekes - Wikipedia
&
The Simple Science of Flight - Amazon

Vriendelijke groeten Ron
Without a watt-meter you are in the dark, until something starts to glow
e-flight calculators watt-meters diy motor tips Cumulus MFC
ron_van_sommeren is offline  
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-07-2018, 01:36 AM   #11
Stick Dude
Member
 
Stick Dude's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Dfw Texas
Posts: 153
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Club: Ill try to become a member of a local rc club...
iTrader: (0)
Friends: (1)
Default

Ah its an observation air plane, cool deal! 747 is indeed a beauty and a work of art. When I was knee high to a grasshopper I flew Lufthansa to live in Germany it was a 747.
Stick Dude is offline  
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-07-2018, 01:49 PM   #12
AusterMark1
New Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2018
Posts: 7
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
iTrader: (0)
Friends: (0)
Default

Actually the AOP squadrons were for directing field artillery fire ("up-a-bit, down-a-bit, left-a-bit, right-a-bit" sort of thing).

Typical operating altitude 500ft, rather susceptible to ground fire, which might be what hit my father's aircraft. Either that, or a "friendly" 25lb artillery shell. Luftwaffe records showed no fighter activity at that time and place.

My father was one of only two of the squadron's original pilots to survive the war. Now I'll try and attach another Normandy photo, showing the squadron commander and the four flight commanders. My father is seated in the middle.


Attached Images
File Type: jpg Normandy Pilots.jpg (1.20 MB, 41 views)
AusterMark1 is offline  
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-07-2018, 02:01 PM   #13
solentlife
Super Contributor
 
solentlife's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Ex UK Brit now in Latvia west coast - Ventspils
Posts: 11,662
View solentlife's Gallery47
Thanked 565 Times in 555 Posts
Club: Founder Member Ventspils RC Club. Ex Waltham Chase and Meon Valley Soaring.
Awards Showcase

Scratchbuilders Award  Scratchbuilders Award  Outstanding Contributor Award  125mph Speed Demon 
iTrader: (0)
Friends: (19)
Default

CD motor ?

At 1:72 ..... that is really pushing the realms of whether it can work ... I have a feeling to stay at that size and get any 'motion' - I think it will have to be fully tethered and not have to generate any lift at all ... a three line suspension similar to a marionette ... where the top is hooked and free to let the aircraft fly circles ... with that - your plastic model could do it ...

Ultra Micro Heli's and Quads have miniature control systems ... allowing remote control etc.

Honest opinion ? I think a hanging static diorama is more achievable.

Would love to see it in action !

Nigel

222kph PKJ,EDF Concorde, Mini4,Mig3,T45,PKJ twin,ME109,Edge540,Cessna182,Skymaster Biplane,F15,F16,Badius,Ultimate,SE5,Qbee10,450 Heli,V911,J3 Cub Founder 9x forum: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Flysky_RC_radio/
- Subscribe my Youtube: "solentlifeuk"
solentlife is offline  
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-07-2018, 02:15 PM   #14
AusterMark1
New Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2018
Posts: 7
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
iTrader: (0)
Friends: (0)
Default

Indeed. A friend of mine, whose father builds REAL (customised) aeroplanes, has suggested that a combination of a fast-revving coarse-pitched propeller plus the two wings of a biplane will simply generate a lot of turbulence rather than a directed air flow. We shall see. I have a 5gm motor with a 6inch prop. As soon as I get a Lipo battery I shall see what it does to cigarette smoke !
AusterMark1 is offline  
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-07-2018, 05:41 PM   #15
solentlife
Super Contributor
 
solentlife's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Ex UK Brit now in Latvia west coast - Ventspils
Posts: 11,662
View solentlife's Gallery47
Thanked 565 Times in 555 Posts
Club: Founder Member Ventspils RC Club. Ex Waltham Chase and Meon Valley Soaring.
Awards Showcase

Scratchbuilders Award  Scratchbuilders Award  Outstanding Contributor Award  125mph Speed Demon 
iTrader: (0)
Friends: (19)
Default

6" prop

Nigel

222kph PKJ,EDF Concorde, Mini4,Mig3,T45,PKJ twin,ME109,Edge540,Cessna182,Skymaster Biplane,F15,F16,Badius,Ultimate,SE5,Qbee10,450 Heli,V911,J3 Cub Founder 9x forum: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Flysky_RC_radio/
- Subscribe my Youtube: "solentlifeuk"
solentlife is offline  
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-07-2018, 10:06 PM   #16
quorneng
Super Contributor
 
quorneng's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Cheshire, UK
Posts: 1,783
Thanked 87 Times in 83 Posts
Club: A lone flyer!
Awards Showcase

Scratchbuilders Award  Scratchbuilders Award 
iTrader: (0)
Friends: (6)
Default

AusterMark1
There is another problem for flight in a diorama, that of scale speed.
Speed is judged by humans as the rate at which something travels its own length. That is why a 747 looks so 'majestic' when flying close to the ground.
At 1/72 scale a plane would have to travel really slowly to look realistic. Unfortunately aerodynamics does scale in anything like the same way.
If it was truly flying a 1/72 Fokker would be a remarkable technical achievement but it would look as if it was going at almost super sonic speed! Not very realistic for a diorama.

Have you seen the YouTube video of the huge Hamburg airport scale diorama. Big airliners taking off and landing very realistically at scale speed but they are most certainly not flying.
quorneng is offline  
  Reply With Quote
Reply

  WattFlyer RC Electric Flight Forums - Discuss radio control eflight > Electric R/C Airplanes > Scale E-Powered Aircraft

Tags
1:72 , replica


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Beginner completely hooked Sham Beginners 18 08-05-2014 05:48 PM
E-Flite Micro AS3Xtra 3D Beginner Well Close! phillipmorris Beginners 7 07-26-2014 03:00 PM
Specifically, Beginner Wants Backyard/Park Flyer Keldar Beginners - Helis 1 03-13-2012 03:26 AM
Please help a beginner Arianna Beginners 12 02-19-2012 08:08 AM
Need help choosing for a beginner [email protected] Beginners 12 06-29-2011 05:01 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:19 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2005 WattfFlyer.com
RCU Eflight HQ

Charities we support Select: Yorkie Rescue  ::  Crohn's & Colitis Foundation



Page generated in 0.18940 seconds with 55 queries