General Electric Discussions Talk about topics related to e-powered RC flying

replacement for 10.5x9 prop

Old 08-03-2020, 06:04 PM
  #1  
AirmanAirhead
Did that tree move??
Thread Starter
 
AirmanAirhead's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Novato, CA
Posts: 607
Default replacement for 10.5x9 prop

I have an old foamy, 300 Extra, and I'm trying to find a replacement prop. It came with a 10.5x9 and it appears those are no longer produced. What would be a good alternative?

AirmanAirhead is offline  
Old 08-03-2020, 07:01 PM
  #2  
solentlife
Super Contributor
 
solentlife's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Ex UK Brit now in Latvia west coast - Ventspils
Posts: 12,523
Default

Not first time a factory has supplied a daft size !!

First you should look at the type of prop it was .. many of these strange sizes are Slow Fly or as I like to call them : Floppy Props ! I HATE THEM !!

But anyway .. IF it is a Slow Fly ... then a lot of thrust is lost when it flexes ... you can hear the prop WOMP as you throttle up .. This means that often a change to a stiffer E prop can either give same or better stable thrust especially when punching out.

A 10.5 x 9 Slow Fly could be easily replaced by a 11x8 ... or my favourite 11x7.5 ....

You can check suitability by using eCalc ... one of the best tools to give you performance values ... enter the values and it will tell you all you need to know to make informed prop decision. Then next is to fit a prop and run a Wattmeter test to determine if you are within motor load range etc.

There is often an advantage gained by sizing the prop to suit YOUR flying instead of just taking factory spec.

Maybe you can post here the brand of model, model size, motor size ... KV .... weight of model etc. as much details as possible so we can possibly advise a prop .. a photo would be nice of the model as well ..
solentlife is offline  
Old 08-03-2020, 08:39 PM
  #3  
AirmanAirhead
Did that tree move??
Thread Starter
 
AirmanAirhead's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Novato, CA
Posts: 607
Default

Thanks I will add more details a bit later. It is not a "slow fly" prop. I will pull the cowling off and check out the motor, as well as send you a pic of my trusty 300 Extra, a bit battle weary, but still fun to fly.
AirmanAirhead is offline  
Old 08-04-2020, 01:08 AM
  #4  
ron_van_sommeren
homo ludens modelisticus
 
ron_van_sommeren's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: near Nijmegen, Nederland
Posts: 1,209
Default

And don't forget to list battery voltage as well.

To give you a rough idea, current drawn is proportional to pitch, #blades and diameter⁴
Current is also proportional to voltage≤ , Kv≥ and gearing≥ .

Silly scenarios:
  • Doubling voltage would would result in a 2≤=4fold increase in current.
  • Doubling Kv would result in a 2≥=8fold increase.
  • Doubling diameter would result in a2⁴=16fold increase.
Realistic smoking scenarios:
More e-calculators, motor- and prop-data in this sticky (note: garbage in, garbage out):
e-flight calculators (compilation) - RCG

Last edited by ron_van_sommeren; 08-04-2020 at 01:59 AM.
ron_van_sommeren is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
admin
General Electric Discussions
5482
08-05-2020 10:23 AM
CHELLIE
Hi-Performance and Sailplanes
2015
05-28-2020 09:50 PM
solentlife
Power Systems
0
04-26-2015 08:00 AM
Alabama Flying Dude
Pusher Park Jets
3
05-19-2012 04:13 PM
mclarkson
General Electric Discussions
12
11-26-2011 10:09 PM

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Quick Reply: replacement for 10.5x9 prop


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Do Not Sell My Personal Information -

Copyright © 2018 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.

Page generated in 0.06892 seconds with 12 queries