Hudson river crash.
#1

I've just seen this on the BBC news, it appears a lucky escape for all !
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/7832191.stm
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/7832191.stm
#4

Reports are that it hit a flock of birds immediately after takeoff ingesting them into both engines. The pilot never had a chance... too low and slow to recover. Looks like he did a stellar job bringing it down in one piece.
bird strikes suck...
[media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LXrjLXI-A64[/media]
bird strikes suck...
[media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LXrjLXI-A64[/media]
#5

I wonder how an Air Bus 320 handles dead stick. Prob. a good thing he kept up the air speed. And how nice the river was open for a ditching. The only thing he told the passengers "Brace for impact"
Last edited by Alpea42; 01-16-2009 at 02:23 AM.
#6

probably not very good!
I did see that the A320 has a "ditching" button. When activated it closes off all air inlets and other sources that water could get into, sealing the cabin airtight. Once in the water the Aircrew is trained to only open the front cabin doors keeping the aft end that is underwater sealed thus making the plane float.
Seems like all the crew did exactly as they were trained to do.
Again, kudos to them! They saved a bunch of lives today.
I did see that the A320 has a "ditching" button. When activated it closes off all air inlets and other sources that water could get into, sealing the cabin airtight. Once in the water the Aircrew is trained to only open the front cabin doors keeping the aft end that is underwater sealed thus making the plane float.
Seems like all the crew did exactly as they were trained to do.
Again, kudos to them! They saved a bunch of lives today.
#14

Decades ago, a fuel measure screwup converted an airliner into a glider over Manitoba. The pilot had a glance around, spotted an abandoned airbase, and landed the thing with minimal damage, and no injuries to passengers or crew. For this heroic piece of airmanship, the company canned him. Eventually, he got his job back.
The Hudson River landing was indeed heroic!
The Hudson River landing was indeed heroic!
#15

Decades ago, a fuel measure screwup converted an airliner into a glider over Manitoba. The pilot had a glance around, spotted an abandoned airbase, and landed the thing with minimal damage, and no injuries to passengers or crew. For this heroic piece of airmanship, the company canned him. Eventually, he got his job back.
The Hudson River landing was indeed heroic!
The Hudson River landing was indeed heroic!
What was the name of that movie?
#17

Decades ago, a fuel measure screwup converted an airliner into a glider over Manitoba. The pilot had a glance around, spotted an abandoned airbase, and landed the thing with minimal damage, and no injuries to passengers or crew. For this heroic piece of airmanship, the company canned him. Eventually, he got his job back.
The Hudson River landing was indeed heroic!
The Hudson River landing was indeed heroic!


#20

In the case of the Gimli Glider, the pilot apparently said that when the engines quit, his original J3 emergency landing days immediately came back. Same procedures, just a bigger plane is all.
I understand that the USAir pilot was ex-military, and again followed procedures, including doing a walk-through of the aircraft to make sure everyone was gone. How cool and controlled is that? Wow....
I understand that the USAir pilot was ex-military, and again followed procedures, including doing a walk-through of the aircraft to make sure everyone was gone. How cool and controlled is that? Wow....
#22

Pilots do that!
On a ground test of the passenger evacuation procedure for the L-1011, on one test I watched the pilot do the cabin tour to verify all the test subjects got out, thereby adding some seconds to the time from the beginning to the conclusion of the official test.
No one chided him on this, it's expected from professionals!
On a ground test of the passenger evacuation procedure for the L-1011, on one test I watched the pilot do the cabin tour to verify all the test subjects got out, thereby adding some seconds to the time from the beginning to the conclusion of the official test.
No one chided him on this, it's expected from professionals!
#23

That's a shame that people and lawyers will get money out of this. Instead they should be happy that an airline bought an airplane that has the ditching/float capability and trained it's crews to preform as outstandingly as they did and saved their lives. Nobody is at fault or should be liable. Only thing to blame here is the birds not the Airline,the crew or anybody else.
If anything the insurance companies should give a reward to the crew and a rebate to the airline for saving them money.
Guess it's the times we live in.
My 2Cents.
If anything the insurance companies should give a reward to the crew and a rebate to the airline for saving them money.
Guess it's the times we live in.

My 2Cents.
