True kv
#2

kV is theoretical. You can expect 20% to 30% less under reasonable load.
kV is how fast the motor would turn if frictionless with no load, calculated based on the winding pattern and number of magnets.
You should be able to mount a popsicle stick as if it was a prop (very low load... a short piece will be better) and use a wattmeter/voltmeter and a tach to check you kV. This works best at the lowest voltage your ESC can use, because some loads go up by the square and others by the cube of rpm.
You'll still get about 5% less than advertised.
If you try to compare static with a prop appropriate to the motor and tach you won't ever get close to rpm = voltage * kV
You can play with it .... check assorted loads on a motor. As the load changes the rpm/volt will change and the watt draw will change. If you have one of the logging ESCs that records rpm, then you can also try no load other than the motor's bearings.
Note that some motors don't cool well with no prop on to aid in blowing air over them.... Even with no load if there's inadequate cooling you can overheat it.
kV is how fast the motor would turn if frictionless with no load, calculated based on the winding pattern and number of magnets.
You should be able to mount a popsicle stick as if it was a prop (very low load... a short piece will be better) and use a wattmeter/voltmeter and a tach to check you kV. This works best at the lowest voltage your ESC can use, because some loads go up by the square and others by the cube of rpm.
You'll still get about 5% less than advertised.
If you try to compare static with a prop appropriate to the motor and tach you won't ever get close to rpm = voltage * kV
You can play with it .... check assorted loads on a motor. As the load changes the rpm/volt will change and the watt draw will change. If you have one of the logging ESCs that records rpm, then you can also try no load other than the motor's bearings.
Note that some motors don't cool well with no prop on to aid in blowing air over them.... Even with no load if there's inadequate cooling you can overheat it.
#3
Past President of PSSF
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Lacey WA, 1 mile E of Mushroom Corner
Posts: 2,030

For outrunners, I have checked no load rpm, by using 2 strips of white tape, or narrow cut off strips of postit notes, stuck to the outside housing of the motor. It's less load than a flat stick, and very easy to do.
For inrunners, I used a circle of stiff paper, with a dark stripe marked across it with a felt pen. Judging by how little air was moving, it also seemed like very little load.
With a wattmeter and an optical tach. note the RPM and the voltage applied at that time. Then divide RPM by Volts.
My tests came out reasonably close to the advertized KV, at least close enough to identify a motor. I buy used outrunners (that do not smell burned!) when I can, so I had to figure out what I had.
For inrunners, I used a circle of stiff paper, with a dark stripe marked across it with a felt pen. Judging by how little air was moving, it also seemed like very little load.
With a wattmeter and an optical tach. note the RPM and the voltage applied at that time. Then divide RPM by Volts.
My tests came out reasonably close to the advertized KV, at least close enough to identify a motor. I buy used outrunners (that do not smell burned!) when I can, so I had to figure out what I had.
#4

- The Kv constant is not a rating, not a figure of merit, it's just a characteristic. More windings will give lower Kv, less windings will give higher Kv, that's all there is to it. No big deal, anyone can do that.
- A motor's Kv constant says nothing about max.power, max.current, efficiency, rpm, quality etc.
- Motors have just one Kv, not e.g. 1450Kv. It is physical quantity (length, weight, time, current, ..,.), not a physical unit (meter, kg, s, ampère, ... ).
Therefore: Kv = 1450rpm/volt. - Motor/battery-current wants to go up with voltage squared and with Kv cubed.
- www.bavaria-direct.co.za
-> motor constants - www.theampeer.org/ampeer/ampjan13/ampjan13.htm
-> Electric Motor Kv
Last edited by ron_van_sommeren; 09-19-2014 at 01:33 AM.
#5

Sometimes you criticize a fact not stated perfectly in your engineering languange...
I said Kv is theoretical (the theoretical rpm per volt if there is no friction or load on the motor) in actual practice you should see less rpm per volt under load.
This is fact.
If you have an ESC which will deliver 1 volt and you don't load the motor at all... its still going to turn a little less because there's friction in the bearings.
I get tired of you "correcting" fact.
I said Kv is theoretical (the theoretical rpm per volt if there is no friction or load on the motor) in actual practice you should see less rpm per volt under load.
This is fact.
If you have an ESC which will deliver 1 volt and you don't load the motor at all... its still going to turn a little less because there's friction in the bearings.
I get tired of you "correcting" fact.
#6

That's why I referred to the generator test, electrical and mechanical resistance have no influence on the measurement.
Last edited by ron_van_sommeren; 09-19-2014 at 06:41 PM. Reason: + this quote
#7
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 40

Thanks for the info guys. From my own experience I have had varying performance from motors with similar specs. Also have read posts relating the advertised kv to the actual kv. When considering a motor for specific type of flying, knowing the kv has been helpful. Kinda new to the e-stuff and wanted to be able to verify these numbers on my own.
#8

Thanks for the info guys. From my own experience I have had varying performance from motors with similar specs. Also have read posts relating the advertised kv to the actual kv. When considering a motor for specific type of flying, knowing the kv has been helpful. Kinda new to the e-stuff and wanted to be able to verify these numbers on my own.
Those KV numbers and associated maximum current/max voltage/max watts values specified by the mfg sometimes are not even close to the real world. Makes me think that those numbers are provided by the Sales Department, not the Engineering department.
One useful value that give some indication of the ability of the motor to provide power is its "Watts per Ounce of Motor" value. This isn't a standard specification by motor supplier. But a reasonable value is about 100 Watts per ounce of motor weight. As an example, a motor weighing in at 6.8 ounces should be able to handle 680 Watts input. And, as usual, higher quality $$$$ motors may be able to handle a bit more, and el-cheapo motors a little less.
A real red flag is a motor claiming to handle 200 Watts per ounce. Unless its a very high RPM ducted fan motor anyhow.
One useful program for calculating this stuff is www.motocalc.com, free for $30 days, then $39. Just input or select your motor, put in the battery and prop size. Motocalc has an "opinions" feature that will let you know if you're pushing the motor beyond safe limits. But again, motocalc is only as accurate as the specs provided by the mfg.
There are also a number of other similar programs, some of which are free.
If you have a "No name" motor, programs such as Motocalc require the motor's KV number, no load amperes, winding resistance, and motor weight. The KV, no load amps, and motor weight can be measured with fairly inexpensive metering equipment. Measuring the motors resistance does take a bit more work. Take a look:
Measuring Brushless Motor Resistance
http://www.wattflyer.com/forums/showthread.php?t=50740
Hope this helps.
#9

I've been using that white tape for years along with a photo RPM tach. Much safer and easier to do than sticking some sort of dummy prop on the motor shaft.
If your tach doesn't respond, just shine a flashlight on it. If you do this inside, just make certain that all indoor lights, especially florescent types are turned off, or your tach will read 3600 RPM.

#11

If you do get around to testing motors, one thing you might notice is that even two "identical" motors can often show significant differences in kV.
This is something I found back when I was doing lots of motor testing. Its not all that unusual to find that even name brand motors vary significantly from one to another - 5% - 10% variations were not unusual.
The cheaper you go , the larger the variance can run into. Ive seen up to 50% or higher differences in cheap motors with the exact same model number, same winds, same everthing that were purchased at the same time from the same dealer.
In some cases it was obvious they were not wound the same way and in others it was hard to tell what it was. I'm assuming poor quality control and sloppy manufacturing techniques. It could also just be they slap any old label on a motor and sell it as what ever they want.
This is something I found back when I was doing lots of motor testing. Its not all that unusual to find that even name brand motors vary significantly from one to another - 5% - 10% variations were not unusual.
The cheaper you go , the larger the variance can run into. Ive seen up to 50% or higher differences in cheap motors with the exact same model number, same winds, same everthing that were purchased at the same time from the same dealer.
In some cases it was obvious they were not wound the same way and in others it was hard to tell what it was. I'm assuming poor quality control and sloppy manufacturing techniques. It could also just be they slap any old label on a motor and sell it as what ever they want.
#12

Notably Drive Calculator, Scorpion Calc and derivatives, E-Calc. E-Calc is not freeware.
FAQ eCalc: Q&A for propCalc, fanCalc, heliCalc, xcopterCalc
FAQ Scorpion Calculator (SC) (not only for Scorpion motors)
#14

My two A50-12S motors were purchased two years apart, and turn the same prop at the same identical RPM. Now, Hacker went and updated them

Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Wanted 2200 kv motor out runner
jim lyle
Motors and Speed Controllers for sale & WTB
2
12-05-2011 03:19 PM
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)