Batteries & Chargers Discuss Li-P, Li-Ion, NiMh, Nicad battery technology and the chargers that juice 'em up!

Shouldn't these numbers be closer to equal?

Old 05-20-2011, 05:40 AM
  #1  
flyyy
Member
Thread Starter
 
flyyy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: nw alabama
Posts: 101
Default Shouldn't these numbers be closer to equal?

To estimate flight time I was reading a post that said. Determine 80% of pack mah. Run pack down to that level keeping the time. Do that a couple of times and you should know real close where to set your timer. [I know you wont be wot all time]. Ran 1000 pack down right at 800 used on tenergy 2 meter. When I charge back up to full the accucel 6 only puts in 630. What gives? Are those mah or just random numbers the mfg. have of keeping up with volume?
flyyy is offline  
Old 05-20-2011, 06:47 AM
  #2  
JetPlaneFlyer
Super Contributor
 
JetPlaneFlyer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Aberdeen, Scotland
Posts: 6,122
Default

I cant explain the difference other than inaccuracy of one or both measuring devices. In reality, due to the fact that batteries are not 100% efficient you will always put a little more energy in than you get out. you certainly wont get more out than you put in, that would be impossible.

Anyway... as a way of estimating flight time it's fundamentally flawed because you dont know how much throttle to use in order to simulate a typical flight. running the battery down at WOT is likely to give far shorter run time than you would actually experience in flight. Also you can never be sure if the battery will actually deliver it's full rated capacity.

A better way if you are confident to glide, or land under much reduced power, is to simply fly to the low volt cut off and then use 80% of that flight time.
Alternatively check the resting voltage after flying and compare that to the figure you got when you bench tested the battery.

Steve

Last edited by JetPlaneFlyer; 05-20-2011 at 01:47 PM.
JetPlaneFlyer is offline  
Old 05-20-2011, 09:54 AM
  #3  
slipstick
Super Contributor
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: N.Staffs, UK
Posts: 2,350
Default

Things like the Tenergy 2 meter which claim to show you amount remaining in a pack are never really accurate. In effect they are just measuring the pack voltage and from that making a guess (or estimate if you want it to sound more technical ) at how much capacity remains.

The amount of charge put in by the Accucell is likely to be a lot nearer the truth.

Steve
slipstick is offline  
Old 05-20-2011, 05:05 PM
  #4  
Larry3215
Look out for that tree!!!
 
Larry3215's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Gig Harbor, Wa USA
Posts: 7,061
Default

The 'Steves' have given you good advice

The better/safer way to determine your max flight time is to start out with a somewhat short flight but fly the way you normally do - dont baby the plane and dont push it extra hard. Just a normal flight.

Recharge the battery and note how many mahr was put back in. Gradually make your flights longer - keeping track of how much you put back in - until you are puttinmg back in about 80% of the battery capacity.
Larry3215 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
bolt
Warbird Electrics
4
04-30-2011 05:56 PM
collective itch
Power Systems
16
02-06-2011 05:28 PM

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Quick Reply: Shouldn't these numbers be closer to equal?


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Do Not Sell My Personal Information -

Copyright 2021 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.

Page generated in 0.10062 seconds with 13 queries