FMA Direct Discuss FMA Direct products or ask your support questions.

Survey from Revolectrix

Old 01-20-2017, 08:56 PM
  #1  
Jamie Marks
New Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 12
Default Survey from Revolectrix

Help us by completing a brief survey and become eligible for prizes from Revolectrix!

http://www.revolectrix.com/new_appli...t01.20.17.html

Thanks,
Jamie Marks
REVO USA
Jamie Marks is offline  
Old 01-20-2017, 10:46 PM
  #2  
birdDog
Charging....
 
birdDog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Too close to Chicago.
Posts: 2,433
Default

I would have liked to see an option for "heard of BUMP system but not interested". People have begun performing quite a bit of parallel charging and my understanding is that the BUMP system does not accommodate this. Your quad system sound nice but I feel it could use a bit more wattage now that larger power systems have come down in prices. We still actively promote the PowerLab line of chargers to all newcomers at the field.
birdDog is offline  
Old 01-21-2017, 01:48 AM
  #3  
Stevephoon
Super Contributor
 
Stevephoon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: White Lake, MI
Posts: 1,139
Default

I have a Powerlab 6 and absolutely love it. Buying it and a parallel charge board was one of the best RC decisions I have made. Also, I do know some high power Heli guys that are always looking for a more powerful charging setup. They already are using your dual PL8. But that is not me.

For me, even the powerlab 6 is overkill. I am a fixed wing guy and the largest batteries I currently use are 4S-4000. I probably max out at around 300 watts of charging power. (4 4S 4000s in parallel charging at 1C) Also, right now I find myself using my parkflyer sized planes the most. These are in the 1500-2600 3S battery size.

So... If I'd be in the market for a new charger, I guess I'd be looking for a full feature 4S 500 Watt minimum system. I am willing to spend some more for a more accurate, higher quality, and safer charger. Parallel charging for me is easier than multiple charges. I am not sold on needing the bump system. It's easy enough for me to set the charge rate myself.

My only quibble with my PL-6 is the display. I'd prefer a larger screen with more status information on each screen. But it's really a rather minor concern.

This is just my thoughts and where I am today...

Steve
Stevephoon is offline  
Old 01-23-2017, 10:21 PM
  #4  
Jamie Marks
New Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 12
Default

Originally Posted by birdDog View Post
I would have liked to see an option for "heard of BUMP system but not interested". People have begun performing quite a bit of parallel charging and my understanding is that the BUMP system does not accommodate this. Your quad system sound nice but I feel it could use a bit more wattage now that larger power systems have come down in prices. We still actively promote the PowerLab line of chargers to all newcomers at the field.
The Bump Controller is actually perfect for parallel charging packs and makes the whole process much simpler once you have your packs programmed with the tags.
Jamie Marks is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Tim Marks
FMA Direct
6
03-03-2016 04:23 AM
Murocflyer
General Electric Discussions
55
05-07-2014 12:24 AM
rcchick
General Electric Discussions
28
04-02-2014 06:15 AM
Howard Matos
FMA Direct
1
11-25-2013 09:22 PM
Tim Marks
FMA Direct
0
12-17-2011 12:26 AM

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Quick Reply: Survey from Revolectrix


Contact Us Archive Advertising Cookie Policy Privacy Statement Terms of Service

Copyright 2018 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.

Page generated in 0.07697 seconds with 15 queries